The difference in Singapore and Australia’s purpose for State of Environment Reporting is due to the perspective and expertise of the publisher. I have taken an objectified viewpoint and have analyzed the report in terms of the purpose, audience, what it reports, writing style, and the authors. (These categories can be seen in further details in the appendix)
Singapore’s SOE report places emphasis on achieving social-economic growth through investing in environmental sustainability. It is organized by the minister of environment and water resources leading to a more political viewpoint in the report. Though it was written in collaboration with the National Environmental Agency and PUB, the members are mainly composed of political and industrial leaders from both public and private sector. As a result, the report takes on a strong political agenda and economic interest by the industry leader. The report outlines environmental achievements and is conveyed through a narrative in the hopes of marketing Singapore to the international market.
Australia’s SOE report is more pragmatic and educational than Singapore’s SOE report. The committee director himself is from a researcher background. Thus, the direction of the report is research-focused. As well the majority of the committee is composed of researchers, professors, statisticians, and ecologist. By having an external committee to produce the report, it reduces the amount of bias from political leaders. The report is filled with empirical facts and figures that place a stance on current conditions and trends in the Australian environment. This form of data is useful for decision- makers to support their policies. The Australia report is more resourceful in providing information and evaluation methods to achieve environmental sustainability in contrast to Singapore’s report which is more like a marketing tool to attract foreign investor to support their socio-economic growth.
Though there are key difference in the reporting style of Singapore and Australia’s State of Environment reporting, they both aim to enhance the well-being of individuals living in these places whether through a political or environmental viewpoint. Sustainability is a prevalent issue that is currently being addressed by both the Singapore and Australian government, in sustaining and managing resources for future generations. Singapore’s method is through promoting socio-economic growth by luring international investors. Australia’s method is through educating their public and assisting their decision-makers to create policies that improve environmental outcomes.
Appendix.
Singapore SOE Report
Purpose: place emphasis on environmental sustainability to support social-economic growth
“Through years of careful environmental management, we have built a clean, green and healthy living environment that has garnered international recognition and is an important factor in attracting investors, tourists and talents to Singapore.”- Dr Yaacob Ibrahim
Audience: International market- investors, tourists, and talents/experts
Reporting: Achievements in environmental sustainability
Writing Style: Narrative
Authors: Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, National Environment Agency (NEA), and PUB
Australia SOE Report
Purpose: educate the public and assist decision-makers with credible environmental data to improve Australian environmental outcome and manage cultural systems for the survival and well-being of Australians
“It is our hope that this report will increase community awareness and understanding of Australia’s environmental issues and assist decision-makers to determine priorities and make national and regional policy and management decisions that improve Australian environmental outcomes.”- Dr Tom Hatton
Audience: public/individual, decision/policy makers
Reporting: information products- empirical environmental data: facts, figures, graphs, illustrations, report-card style grading to assess conditions & trends
Writing Style: report & expository writing
Author: 2011 Australian State of the Environment Committee